Details
Assignee
UnassignedUnassignedReporter
Ron RoskensRon RoskensLabels
Components
Affects versions
Priority
Major
Details
Details
Assignee
Unassigned
UnassignedReporter
Ron Roskens
Ron RoskensLabels
Components
Affects versions
Priority
MajorPagerDuty
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
Created May 12, 2014 at 6:24 PM
Updated September 21, 2021 at 9:14 PM
I'm trying to setup a provisioning requisition for some routers that are acting in an HA pair.
<model-import date-stamp="2014-05-12T16:42:09.274-05:00" foreign-source="NetworkTeam" last-import="2014-05-12T16:47:09.635-05:00" xmlns="http://xmlns.opennms.org/xsd/config/model-import">
<node building="NetworkTeam" foreign-id="1399931194168" node-label="router-float">
<interface descr="" ip-addr="192.168.1.254" status="1" snmp-primary="P"/>
</node>
<node building="NetworkTeam" foreign-id="1399931160388" node-label="router-b">
<interface descr="" ip-addr="192.168.1.253" status="1" snmp-primary="P"/>
</node>
<node building="NetworkTeam" foreign-id="1399931115556" node-label="router-a">
<interface descr="" ip-addr="192.168.1.252" status="1" snmp-primary="P"/>
</node>
</model-import>
<foreign-source name="NetworkTeam" date-stamp="2013-09-25T10:40:08.903-05:00" xmlns="http://xmlns.opennms.org/xsd/config/foreign-source">
<scan-interval>1d</scan-interval>
<detectors>
<detector name="ICMP" class="org.opennms.netmgt.provision.detector.icmp.IcmpDetector"/>
<detector name="SNMP" class="org.opennms.netmgt.provision.detector.snmp.SnmpDetector"/>
</detectors>
<policies>
<policy name="Gateway IP Addresses" class="org.opennms.netmgt.provision.persist.policies.MatchingIpInterfacePolicy">
<parameter key="action" value="DO_NOT_PERSIST"/>
<parameter key="matchBehavior" value="ALL_PARAMETERS"/>
<parameter key="ipAddress" value="~^192\.168\.\d+\.254$"/>
</policy>
</policies>
</foreign-source>
Now suppose the above does not specify all ip addresses on the routers, and the interface scan adds 20 more vlan entries for each router. so router-a adds 192.168.10-29.252, router-b adds 192.168.10-29.253. Since router-a is currently the active router, router-float adds 192.168.10-29.252, and does not 192.168.10-29.254.
I'd like to be able to exclude all the .254 address using a DO_NOT_PERSIST for router-a and router-b, but not for router-float. And vice-versa, I'd like to exclude all the .252 and .253 from router-float, but not for router-a and router-b.
It would be nice to be able to specify a regular expression to use against either the foreign-id or node-label.
I suppose a way to accomplish this would be to use two different requisitions. Put all routers and their static ip addresses into one, and put the HA ip addresses into a second. Having an enhanced MatchingIpInterfacePolicy that would let me do that inside one requisitions would keep things a bit neater though, I think.